Interesting observation! Does that affect your overall game? Do you think the 243 is better for new golfers?
I think the 243 could be suitable for beginners due to its forgiveness, but as for durability, the 245 is definitely the winner in tough terrains.
I’ve beaten my 245s up pretty good, and they still look practically new! Played a month straight on rocky courses without a scratch. Super impressive durability.
Do you guys think the added durability of the 245 justifies the extra cash? I’m on a budget and need my clubs to last.
For me, it totally does! Investing in quality clubs pays off in the long run. You avoid constant replacements!
I’ve used both sets on various terrains, and I’d say the 245 is more versatile especially with wear. But honestly, if you’re playing primarily on well-maintained courses, the 243 could be fine.
Completely agree! If you are playing only on pristine courses, that’s a different story! But if you venture into less forgiving places, the 245 is your best friend!
Has anyone else had issues with the grips on the 243? I feel like they wear out way too quickly.
Yes! My grips definitely went slick way faster than expected. I’ve had to replace them after just half a season.
Finding replacements is a hassle too! Is it just me, or does anyone else feel more attached to clubs that perform better over time? It’s like a relationship, you want it to last.
Absolutely! I want clubs that are loyal. The 245s feel like they would stick with me through thick and thin!
It’s quite humorous how attached we get to these clubs! But seriously, after all this feedback, I’m leaning more toward the 245s. Can’t risk losing my game to wear and tear!
I’ve tried both the Mizuno 245 and 243, and I found that the 245 has a wider fit, which works better for my slightly wider feet. Anyone else notice this difference?
I totally agree! The 245 feels like it was made for my foot shape. I also feel like the 243 has a tighter fit, which might not suit everyone.
I have narrow feet, and I preferred the 243. It felt snug but comfortable. Does anyone have suggestions for sizing if you have narrow feet?
You might want to try going half a size down on the 243. It’s crucial to get that fit right, especially for performance.
I’ve got flat feet, and I found the arch support in the 245 to be fantastic! It made a noticeable difference in my comfort level during a round.
That’s great to hear! I was a bit hesitant due to my high arches. Are there others with high arches that found either model more comfortable?
For me, the 243 fit just right with no slipping, even with my arch problem. It sounds like the 245 could be a better choice for those with flatter arches.
I definitely think personal fitting experience matters. Is it worth trying both if you live near a pro shop? That way, you can see which feels best on your foot.